The New York Times The New York Times National Personalize your news
 

NYTimes: Home - Site Index - Archive - Help

Log In - Register Now  It's Free!
Site Search:  


Advertisement




NYT Store
Photo: Women's union float, 1936Photo: Women's union float, 1936
Learn More.


ARTICLE TOOLS
Email This Article E-Mail This Article
Printer Friendly Format Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-mailed Articles Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints & Permissions Reprints & Permissions

TIMES NEWS TRACKER

  Topics

Alerts
Labor


Unionization


Freedom and Human Rights



Labor Rallies in Support of Bill to Back the Right to Join Unions

By STEVEN GREENHOUSE

Published: December 11, 2003

In demonstrations and marches in 70 cities, the labor movement seized on International Human Rights Day yesterday to begin a campaign asserting that American corporations routinely violate an internationally guaranteed right: the right to unionize.

Organized labor has begun this campaign to help persuade Congress to enact a law making it easier to unionize and to draw attention to thousands of instances each year in which they say companies break the law to beat back unionization drives. The bill would increase penalties on employers who fire workers for supporting unions and would allow workers to choose a union by signing cards instead of holding an election.

Pointing to polls showing that 42 million Americans would join a union if they could, union leaders said corporate America's resistance to unionization was the main reason union membership had fallen. The percentage of American workers in unions is 13 percent, down from 35 percent in the 1950's.

On Wall Street, John J. Sweeney, the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s president, said, "There are more than 40 million workers in our country who say they would join a union in an instant if they could — but they are prevented from doing that by employers and antiworker elected leaders who have systematically stolen the freedom to organize from workers."

Reflecting some success in building popular support for their campaign, unions persuaded Atlanta's mayor, the executive director of Amnesty International U.S.A. and two Democratic presidential candidates, Howard Dean and Dennis J. Kucinich, to attend labor rallies yesterday.

Many corporate executives and labor critics assert that union membership has fallen because many unions are out of touch with workers' needs and because workers see no need for a union. "The reason they can't reverse their decline in membership is they can't come up with an agenda relevant to today's work force," said Randel K. Johnson, vice president for labor, immigration and employee benefits at the United States Chamber of Commerce. "They keep using rhetoric out of the 1930's that employers are bad and that the labor laws are weak. The labor laws haven't changed since the 1950's when union membership was at its height."

In rallies in Atlanta, Washington and Cleveland, labor leaders said a Cornell University study had found that corporations fired the most outspoken union supporters in one out of four organizing drives. Union leaders also complained that it often takes years for the National Labor Relations Board to reinstate fired workers and by that time unionization drives have often fizzled.

In New Haven, 103 workers and students were arrested for blocking the streets in a protest calling for labor rights.

"There is little enforcement and what enforcement exists is ineffective," James P. Hoffa, the Teamsters president, said at a rally in Atlanta.

Yesterday's labor gatherings resembled political rallies as some Democrats embraced labor's cause in part to shore up their labor support. At a meeting with union activists in Concord, N.H., Dr. Dean said this was "the right to have not only globalization of multinational corporations rights, it's also about the right to globalize workers' rights."

At a rally by several hundred union members in front of the Labor Department in Washington, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, said, "We want this administration to stop being the most antiworker, antilabor administration that we have seen."

Then, Gerald McEntee, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, called President Bush "the most antiworker" president and said the Bush administration had "launched unprecedented assaults against working families" by trying to end overtime pay for eight million workers and by "trying to bust federal unions like never before."

Responding to Mr. McEntee, Ed Frank, a Labor Department spokesman, said, "What else would you expect from the head of the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s partisan political committee? The reality is that we have positive working relationships with numerous labor unions."


Get home delivery of The Times from $2.90/week





RELATED ARTICLES
. Metro Briefing | Connecticut: New Haven: Unionization Urged At Yale  (May 31, 2001) 
. Labor Leader Sounds Do-or-Die Warning  (February 19, 2001)  $
. New Economy; The updated context notwithstanding, the issues behind unionization drives at dot-coms have a familiar ring.  (January 22, 2001)  $
. Judge Finds Labor Law Broken at Meat-Packing Plant  (January 4, 2001)  $
Find more results for Labor and Unionization

TOP NATIONAL ARTICLES
. The Context: Court Ruling Affirms New Landscape of Campaign Finance
. Bush's Advisers Focus on Dean as Likely Opponent Next Year
. West Texans Sizzle Over a Plan to Sell Their Water
. Mental Health Experts Call Sniper Defendant Brainwashed
Go to National

OUR ADVERTISERS
Hard Drive FREE Hard Drive Upgrade- Dell PCs online

Equity Market Weekly From Smith Barney

L.L.Bean: Hundreds of holiday gifts under $30 for the entire family.